[1680] Mor 12502
Subject_1 PROOF.
Subject_2 DIVISION III. Public Instrument, how far Probative.
Subject_3 SECT. II. Notary's Instrument.
Date: Edward Ruthven
v.
The Earl of Callander
30 June 1680
Case No.No 371.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
The Lords found, Though a minor's curators cannot sell heritage, without a decreet of vendition, yet they may require the money of a wadset, and renounce it; and, if a decreet be needful, the decreet of suspension of Session is sufficient. They also repelled this objection against the instrument of requisition, that Callander offered to prove, by the procuratory and witnesses, only 24,000 merks of the sum was required, and not the whole, unless he would consign L. 40 Scots, and offer to improve it; because, the notary's common instruments be not probative till the witnesses inserted be examined; yet instruments of premonition, requisition, resignation, and sasine, are probative of themselves; because, they depend on procuratories and precepts, and are the foundations and parts of securities of estates.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting