[1678] Mor 12325
Subject_1 PROOF.
Subject_2 DIVISION I. Allegeances how relevant to be proved.
Subject_3 SECT. III. What Proof relevant to take away Writ.
Date: M'Kenzie of Suddy
v.
Grahame of Drynie
30 November 1678
Case No.No 96.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
The Lords refused to sustain this reason of reduction of a decreet, That the clerk had drawn the interlocutor contrary to the testimonies of the witnesses; for this would bring all decreets overhead, by fixing a pretended guilt on the clerks. Thereafter the Lords renewed their act for sealing the deposition; but, before extracting the decreet, the Lords will not refuse to review, as in Tweedale and Drummelzier's case.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting