[1677] Mor 2090
Subject_1 CAUTIONER.
Subject_2 SECT. IV. Cautioner, how far Liable.
Date: The Town of Aberdeen
v.
Divvie
13 November 1677
Case No.No 22.
A cautioner, not bound conjunctly and severally with the principal, found not conveenable without the principal.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
The Town of Aberdeen having given commission to Gilbert Divvie to collect a stent on the Town, as appears by their act produced; William Divvie, his father, becomes cautioner for his fidelity and duty in that commission; whereupon the Town pursues Patrick, as representing William, his father, for payment of the sum; who alleged no process, because his father was only cautioner, and not bound conjunctly and severally; and so but liable subsidiarie after the principal party is discussed.—It was answered, That the principal is a known bankrupt, and nothing can be condescended on that he hath to affect; and therefore, as heirs of provision are liable, without calling the heirs of line, unless it be condescended on what estate the heirs of line have; so must it be here.—It was replied, That the case is not alike; for here the principal party, whatever estate he hath, may compt and produce discharges, if he were called.
The Lords found no process, and assoilzied from this libel; and would not continue the same against the principal party, though bankrupt, but did put them to a new process.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting