[1676] Mor 13100
Subject_1 PUBLIC OFFICER.
Date: The Earl of Kinghorn
v.
The Town of Forfar
18 July 1676
Case No.No 14.
Rights of an heritable Constable.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
There being mutual declarators between the Earl of Kinghorn and the Burgh of Forfar; the Earl pursuing declarator of his right, as Heritable Constable of Forfar, and the Town their privilege, as a free burgh within their own bounds; the Lords having appointed either party to produce all evidents they could make use of, and to adduce such documents and testimonies as they would make use of, for clearing the possession; the Earl insisted on these particulars, and produced an ancient infeftment by the King to the Lord Gray, containing the office of Constable of Forfar, cum feodis et divoriis ejusdem; he did also produce a commission to the Provost and Bailies of Forfar, for uplifting the customs of St James's Fair, and the fines of transgressors at that time, and some acts and scrolls, shewing the Constable had used jurisdiction at the said fair, and at other times; and insisted, That it might be declared, that he had right to the office of Constable of Forfar, with power to proclaim and ride their fairs, and to hold Courts, and to punish all transgressors within the bounds of the burgh, and to uplift the customs of their fairs, and that he had right of property to the Castle hill of Forfar. It was alleged for the Town, 1mo, That the Earl's right, being general and antiquated, could have no effect, unless it were established; for the ground of that right being as Constable of the King's Castle
of Forfar, and of the bounds adjacent, he might punish transgressors, and might preserve the quiet and good order of public fairs against the disorders of these ruder times; yet now the Castle being razed and demolished, and the people civilized, there is no ground to encroach upon the freedom of an ancient Royal Burgh, but to suffer them to enjoy their customs and jurisdictions as other Royal Burghs in the kingdom; 2do, Though any thing could be claimed upon the account of that office, yet it could not be extended beyond ancient possession; and by the witnesses for both parties, it appeareth, that the Town hath lifted their own customs, that they paid only 20 merks yearly to the Constable, and that he used jurisdiction only as to disorders in St James's Fair; but now the Town having lately obtained from the King four other fairs, with all their customs, he hath no interest therein. It was answered, That the office of Constable had a known power to ride and preserve the peace of public fairs, and, on that account, to receive the customs thereof, and to exercise jurisdiction at all times, which is common to all the Constables in Scotland, whereof there were many; so that, unless these privileges be lost by prescription of liberty, the right continues, and any possession preserves the same; aud, as to the new fairs, they are but lately granted, and the Constable's office extends to them as well as to the old fair. The Lords found, by the writs produced, and testimonies adduced, that the Constable of Forfar had right to proclaim St James's Fair, which hath always been proclaimed in his own, the King, and the Town's names; and that the Constable gave commission to the Provost and a Bailie to lift the customs and amerciaments of St James's Fair, in anno 1625; and since that, the Magistrates have constantly raised the same, and paid 20 merks yearly to the Constable therefor; and that the Constable had the keys of the Tolbooth, and exercised sole jurisdiction as to the disorders done during that fair; but found, that he had no interest in the later fairs, nor any customs thereof, nor in any but in St James's Fair: They found also, that neither party had right of property to the Castle-hill; but the Town had been in ancient possession thereof, and the Constable to keep Courts thereon, reserving to the King the right of property, as accords.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting