Where Possession commenced lawfully, the continuing in Possession will not be Vitious Intromission.
Lady Spencerfield v. Hamilton
Date: 10 June 1674 Case No. No 163.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
When a person enters to the possession of the defunct's house by a warrant of the Lords, his possession of the goods in the house does not infer vitious intromission, unless he make use of goods, which usu consumuntur, or dispose of goods that are not of that nature, such as beds, tables, &c.
