Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
A singular successor, though not infeft, was allowed to produce his author's infeftment, against which certification had been extracted, and to be reponed against the same, he, the singular successor, not having been called in the reduction and improbation.
Fol. Dic. v. 2. p. 350. Stair.
*** This case in No 7. p. 6796, voce Indefinite Intromission.
