If you found BAILII useful today, could you please make a contribution?
Your donation will help us maintain and extend our databases of legal information. No contribution is too small. If every visitor this month donates, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Competent to the Remoter Heir, after the immediate Apparent Heir's decease.
Janet Schaw v. Margart Calderwood
Date: 21 January 1668 Case No. No 15.
The Lords found, that a disposition made in lecto, may be reduced, not only at the instance of the apparent heir living at the time, but he dying, at the instance of the heir who succeeds him.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Janet Schaw pursues a reduction of a liferent infeftment, granted to Margaret Calderwood by the pursuer's father, as being in lecto. The defender alleged no process, because the pursuer was not heir the time of the disposition, but another heir apparent, who never entered.
The Lords repelled the defence.
The defender alleged, That this being a liferent infeftment to her by her husband, and but of a small value, it was valid, and the husband might discharge that natural debt of providing his wife on death-bed, she having no contract of provision before.—The pursuer answered, That the defender might take the benefit of her terce, which is her legal provision, beyond which, a deed on death-bed (in prejudice of the heir) is null, and this liferent is of the husband's whole estate; and yet the pursuer is willing it should stand, it being restricted to a third of the rents of the lands.
The Lords sustained the infeftment only for a third.
