[1666] Mor 3714
Subject_1 EXECUTION.
Subject_2 DIVISION II. Where Parties must be Cited, and Execution done.
Subject_3 SECT. IV. When the party is out of the kingdom.
Date: Cunningham
v.
Cunningham
4 July 1666
Case No.No 48.
A denunciation at the market cross of Edinburgh against a person out of the country is sufficient, tho' his lands lye in another sheriffdom.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Jean Cunningham donatar to the liferent escheat of umquhile Sir David Cunningham of Robertland, pursuing a general declarator, the horning was quarrelled upon this ground, that Sir Robert being in England the time of the denunciation, and the denunciation being at the market-cross of Edinburgh, the samen was null, because it should have been executed at Irvine, the head burgh of the bailliary within which the lands lye, especially Sir Robert having been for the time prisoner in England, and so absent republicæ causa. The Lords, notwithstanding of the allegeance proponed, sustained the horning, and found it sufficient to denounce at Edinburgh, and pier and shore of Leith, tanquam communis patria.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting