British
and Irish Legal Information Institute
Freely Available British and Irish Public Legal Information
[
Home]
[
Databases]
[
World Law]
[
Multidatabase Search]
[
Help]
[
Feedback]
Scottish Court of Session Decisions
You are here:
BAILII >>
Databases >>
Scottish Court of Session Decisions >>
Jean Bathgate v John Armstrong and John Rollo. [1666] 1 Brn 521 (1 February 1666)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1666/Brn010521-1363.html
[
New search]
[
Printable PDF version]
[
Help]
[1666] 1 Brn 521
Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by SIR JOHN BAIRD OF NEWBYTH.
Jean Bathgate
v.
John Armstrong and John Rollo
Date: 1 February 1666
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In an exhibition of writs, pursued at the instance of Jean Bathgate against John Armstrong:—
In this pursuit there was compearance made for Mr John Rollo, Henry Rollo, his son, and several other agents and servants in the house;—who alleged, That they were not liable to depone anent the having of the writs, being members of the house; and, having received up writs of a party, they cannot swear in prejudice of their client.
The Lords repelled the allegeance, and found, They ought to depone: as was found in the like case against Sir Robert Hepburn.
Page 54.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting