[1665] Mor 9150
Subject_1 MUTUAL CONTRACT.
Subject_2 SECT. II. Contract performable at different periods. - Effect of non-performance, and of over-performance. - If the one party repudiate, is the other free? - Whether irritancy implied by failing to perform at the day. - Effect of improper performance. - Contract for mariners wages. - Contract between master and servant. - Contract of affreightment. - Contract not signed by all parties. - Obligation ad factum pręstandum.
Date: Cheisly
v.
Cuthbert
5 December 1665
Case No.No 17.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Cheisly charges Cuthbert for his prentice-fee, who suspends and alleges, That he was set prentice to him as apothecary, and that he deserted that employment and became a druggist, and thereupon the suspender left him.—It was answered, That the breeding him as a druggist was sufficient, and that he now practised as apothecary and chirurgeon.
The Lords found this answer not relevant, the suspender being set to him as apothecary, to make drugs, and not as a druggist that buys drugs, as to the time after he changed; but the charger having farther offered to prove, that he constantly in his chamber makes as well as sells drugs, the Lords found it relevant.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting