Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by ROBERT MACGILL, LORD FOORD.
Date: -
v.
James Ros
13 December 1649 Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In the removing of James Ros,—the Lords, not knowing that there was an exception proponed upon a tack for terms to run, and admitted to the defender's probation, had ordained £40 of expenses for the proponing of that reply, anent a commission for division; which was against the form; and therefore, upon farther information, delayed that anent the expenses until the event of the process.
Page 87.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting