[1639] Mor 3473
Subject_1 DILIGENCE.
Subject_2 SECT. I. Diligence prestable by Apprisers.
Date: Hamilton
v.
Lauder
9 February 1639
Case No.No 4.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
A tenant who had a current tack, having, after a comprising, deserted his possession;—found, that the lying waste thereof ought not to prejudice the debtor, but that the compriser ought to be accountable for the same, since he neither laboured nor set it, nor made any intimation to the debtor to take care of it.
*** See This case, No 41. p. 3391.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting