[1637] Mor 2730
Subject_1 COMPETENT.
Subject_2 SECT. XIII. Want of Consent of Curators how Proponable.
Date: L Lamond
v.
Murray
29 June 1637
Case No.No 59.
The Lords found that the exception of minority, proponed by one, who, at granting the writ in controversy, was in familia paterna, was receivable without necessity of reduction.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
The Laird of Lamond, suspending the charges given by Donald Murray, upon an obligation granted him of 3000 merks, upon this reason, That at the time of the bond he was minor, and was then in familia paterna, and done without his consent, who in law is his administrator, and therefore was null; likeas he has intented reduction upon this same reason, which he produced in process. And the charger answering, That when his reduction is insisted upon, and ready for reasoning, he shall answer thereto; but by way of suspension, it is against the practice and reason, to receive this allegeance, it consisting in facto, to be tried so summarily, where it cannot be instantly verified, but must receive terms of probation; specially seeing he is content to find caution, to refund the money in case the suspender prevail in this reduction.——The Lords found, That they would receive this reason of minority to be discussed, and tried in this same place, by way of suspension, without necessity of further process in reduction, but declared, that they would assign only one term to prove the same, without prorogation of further diets, and therefore assigned a day to prove the reasons, at the which term the Lords declared they would conclude the process and advise the cause, and would grant no more terms to prove.
Act. Gilmour. Alt. ——. Clerk, Scot.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting