Subject_1 PROOF.
Subject_2 DIVISION I. Allegeances how relevant to be proved.
Subject_3 SECT. IX. Naked Promise.
Date: L Ernock
v.
L Preston.
25 February 1636
Case No.No 186.
Found the reverse of Russell against Paterson, (supra.)
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Laird of Ernock pursuing the young Laird of Preston, for payment to him of L. 100 promised to him by Preston; and It being, questioned by the defender, that this promise ought to be proved by writ, or the defender's oath, and no otherwise; the Lords found, that the same might be proved by witnesses, and admitted the same to probation, to be so proved; seeing it was only the promise of L. 100, and not above that sum; for, if it had been above that sum, they would have found it only probable scripto vel juramento partis.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting