[1635] Mor 14994
Subject_1 SUMMARY DILIGENCE.
Date: Brown
v.
Binnie
12 February 1635
Case No.No. 16.
Summary diligence cannot proceed, even at the instance of parties contractors and subscribers, where the principal party is dead.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
By contract of marriage betwixt Robert Brown, on the one part, and Margaret Binnie, his future spouse, with consent of John and Alexander Binnies, her brethren, on the other part, the said Robert is obliged to employ the tocher to himself and his future spouse in life-rent, and to the heirs begotten betwixt them in fee, which failing, the one half to himself, and the other half to the said John and Alexander Binnies; which contract, after the decease of the wife, being registered, by consent of procurators, at the instance of the said John and Alexander Binnies, and the said Robert Brown charged thereupon to fulfil the same, and he suspending the said charges; the Lords found, That, seeing the principal party, viz. the wife, who, by the procuratory contained in the contract, gave warrant to the procurators to compear, and consent to the registration, was deceased before the registration thereof, that the same could not be so summarily registered, by the consent of procurators adhibited for the parties consenters; notwithstanding that it was alleged for them, That they were parties contractors, and had subscribed the contract, and so they might lawfully register the same, and seek execution thereupon; and that being the case, it was more than if there had been only a clause conceived in their favours, quo casu such summary registration could not have been sustained; but they being expressly contractors and subscribers, the case was far different; which allegeance was repelled, and, notwithstanding thereof, the Lords found, that the contract could not be so summarily registered, at the instance of the consenters, after the death of the principal party; but reserved to them their action
to pursue for fulfilling to them of that contract, in any head obligatory in their favours, by way of ordinary action prout de jure. *** Auchinleck reports this case: Contracts or bonds cannot be registered, or charges raised and executed thereupon, at the instance of consenters, the principal being dead, but it must be pursued by way of action.
*** Spottiswood also reports this case: By contract of marriage between Robert Brown and Christian Binnie, with consent of John and Alexander her brethren, it was provided, that the half of her tocher should be repaid by the said Robert to her said brethren in case of her decease without children. After her decease, her brethren registered this contract, and charged Robert for fulfilling that part of it. The Lords would not sustain the registration at their instances, after her decease, although they were parties consenters in the contract, and in whose favours that condition was conceived, but ordained them to pursue it by way of ordinary action.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting