[1634] Mor 6640
Subject_1 IMPROBATION.
Subject_2 SECT. I. To Whom this action competent.
Date: Lo Johnston
v.
Johnston
3 December 1634
Case No.No 45.
An apparent heir not retoured, found to have no title to pursue an improbation of deeds derived from his predecessors. See No 1. p. 6615.
An apprising with a charge without infeftment, is a title, in an improbation of all rights affecting the lands, so far as to force production.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
The Lord Johnston having charged one Johnston of Neis to enter heir to James Johnston of Lochouse, who was his debtor, and who had right to the lands of ———, and having so comprised from him, as lawfully charged to enter heir, all the said James Johnston of Lochouse's right, and also as having right made to him by the said Johnston of Neis, as apparent heir to the said James Johnston of Lochouse, pursues the Earl of Queensberry, and certain others, for improbation of all writs made to them of the said lands, by the said James Johnston; in which action of improbation, the Lords found no process at the pursuer's instance, super hoc titulo, as having right from the apparent heir; for the apparent heir himself, without infeftment or retour, could not be heard to pursue an improbation super hoc titulo as apparent heir; albeit an apparent heir may call for exhibition and production of writs, which pursuit is only sustained for exhibition, that he may advise whether he will enter heir or not, but not for delivery, which the apparent heir cannot crave; and as the apparent heir cannot pursue to produce to be improven [for if the defender compear not, no certification decerning to make no faith can be granted to the apparent heir] no more therefore at the instance of one having right from the apparent heir; but process was sustained at the Lord Johnston's instance, as having comprised from the apparent heir, who was charged to enter heir, for that charge and comprising, so long as they stood, were as sufficient as if he had been retoured heir.
Act. Stuart et Cunninghame. Alt. Nicolson. Clerk, Scot. *** The same found Dunbar against Maxwell, 14th July 1671, voce Citation, No 86. p. 2223.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting