Peculiarities in the Execution of Mutual Contracts and Decrees Arbitral.
Beatie v. Dundie
Date: 7 March 1633 Case No. No. 238.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Charges upon a decreet arbitral being suspended, because the decreet was inserted in a blank on the back of the submission, and the same was only subscribed by the Judges, to whom the matter was submitted, and was not subscribed by the parties submitters, as ought to have been done in such cases.; the reason was repelled, and the decreet was sustained, albeit the blank was not subscribed by the parties, but by the Judges only, in respect the submission on the other side of that blank wherein the decreet is inserted, is subscribed by the parties, and there is no necessity found, that the decreet should be subscribed by the parties, but by the Judges only.
Alt. Gibson.Clerk, Hay.
Durie, p. 678.
*** The like found 12th March 1707, Knox against Home, No. 7. p. 625. voce Arbitration.
