Not to be prejudiced by the neglect of his Officers.
The King v. Earl of Strathern
Date: 22 March 1633 Case No. No 18.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
The King, by his advocate, having compeared at a service, and consented thereto, and done several other deeds of homologation thereof afterwards; nevertheless a reduction of the retour was thereafter sustained, at his Majesty's instance, after better information, because the wrong information and neglect of the officers ought not to prejudge his Majesty.
Fol. Dic. v. 1. p. 524. Durie.
*** This case is No 116. p. 6690. voce Improbation.
