[1630] Mor 16831
Subject_1 WRIT.
Subject_2 SECT. II. Deeds signed by Notaries.
Date: Ross
v.
Home
26 January 1630
Case No.No. 43.
A disposition to a life rent of a house constituted by infeftment, was found not a deed of importance, the rent being only 31. or 41. Scots.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In a removing pursued by a compriser, deduced against the liferenter, and fiar of the lands comprised, one of the defenders, in the removing, defending with a disposition of the life-rent, made to him of that land before the decreet, whereupon the comprising was deduced; this disposition anterior to the decreet was sustained, albeit was not subscribed by two notaries and before four witnesses; for albeit it was constituted by infeftment, yet it was not found to be a matter of importance falling under the act of Parliament, seeing it was only the life-rent of a house, which was valued not to be worth of yearly mail, £3 or £4 Scots, being in North Berwick: And sicklike it was sustained, albeit it was quarrelled, as falling tinder the act of divory, because it was disponed to a conjunct person, viz. the disponer's sister's son, for no just nor competent price, but only bearing to be done for satisfaction of £40, owing by the disponer to the excipient for malt silver, which is not the full price of the life-rent, and is done long after the bond of the debt owing to the pursuer, whereupon he obtained sentence, and whereon he comprised; for albeit his diligence be after the disposition, yet the debt and bond preceded the same, and after that bond no deed could be done by the debtor to prejudge his debt. This allegeance was also repelled, and the disposition sustained.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting