Subject_1 SOLIDUM ET PRO RATA. Subject_2 SECT. XIV.
Executors how liable? - In a Process must they all concur, or have they Action pro rata?
Semple v. Dobie
Date: 24 March 1630 Case No. No. 74.
As one of several executors may be sued alone, if he has intromited with as much as will pay the debt, so may payment be made to one, of the whole debt, when the others have intromitted as far beyond their share.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
This is mentioned in the 17th of March, 1630, No. 75. p. 2739. voce Competent, where the payment alleged made to one of the two conjunct executors, was sustained to liberate from the whole; and that the other executrix, who acclaimed her own half of that debt alleged paid, could not seek any part thereof, nor oppone to that discharge, because she had intromitted with her own half of the whole goods, and with also much more, as the debt now paid to the other executor extended to, which allegeance was sustained to maintain the said payment and discharge; and it was not respected what the said executrix answered, that this was not pertinent to this debtor to allege, that an executor had intromitted with more than his own part, and more than the others; for that was proper to the executors among themselves to count thereon, and which they would do in their own competent time; but this not being alleged by theco-executor, it could not be proponed by the debtor; which was repelled, and the said allegeance sustained: For as an executor may be convened alone, where there are two or more executors, by the creditor for the whole debt, if he has intromitted with as much as may pay it, so may payment be made to one of the whole debt, where the other executor has intromitted with the like quantity more than his own part.
