Subject_1 REDUCTION.
Date: Sir John Scot, Supplicant
24 July 1630
Case No.No 30.
Formalities of a summons of error and reduction of retours.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
This day Sir John Scot gave in a supplication to the Lords, making mention, That all summons of error and reduction of retours, has been by ancient custom used to be expede at the chancellery, and written in Latin, and under the quarter seal, whereas now lately many are written in Scots, by the ordinary writers to the signet, albeit there is an express act of Parliament, ordaining, that the order of the chancellery should not be broken; therefore he desired the Lords to make an act in their sederunt books, that no summons of reduction of any retour should be expede, but as said is, in Latin, and in parchment, under the quarter seal, and by the director of the chancellery, his deputes and servants, and that no process should be granted in time coming upon any summons otherwise raised. The Lords ordained this to be done, and found, that the [same ought to be observed in all summonses for reducing of retours, which were principally called to be reduced, but not where other writs were principally to be reduced, and retours to fall in consequence; and where retours were called principally to be reduced, they thought the said order should be kept, albeit the summons concluded no error, and albeit the persons assizers were neither desired to be punished for wilful error, nor yet that they were called in the process, but only that the pursuer desired the retour to be reduced against the direct party served, or some representing him; for the Lords found, that such actions concerned the assizers, who, albeit they were not pursued to be punished for wilful error, yet by act of Parliament, there is ignorance allegeable against them, and so for ignorance their deed being quarrelled, the same ought to be tried by order of the chancellery anciently
observed, but the matter was thereafter ordained to lie over till further advisement, see No 17.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting