Subject_1 TUTOR - CURATOR - PUPIL.
Date: White
v.
Douglas
5 March 1629
Case No.No. 106.
Rights respecting the pupil conveyed to the tutor accresce to the pupil.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
The husband being obliged to provide his wife, as is deduced, and marked, No. 3. p. 3049. and one of the bonds, whereof the relict craved a life-rent of the sums therein contained, being made to the husband by his brother, which brother was tutor to the heir of the defunct, who was convened, for fulfuling of his father's obligation, and the said relict having discharged the said tutor of the annual-rent of that bond, for her life-time, in favours of the tutor, for love and favour borne by her to him, and for his pains, as tutor, in the minor's affairs; it was found, That albeit this discharge was sufficient to, exclude the relict, and to denude her of her life-rent thereof, yet that could not liberate the tutor at the minor's hands, but that he remained obliged to his pupil in the said annual-rent, and that the benefit of the discharge of the life-rent, albeit in favours of the tutor,; yet should accresce to the pupil, and be profitable to him, and not to the tutor, who was debtor, seeing the cause thereof was for the tutor's pains in the minor's affairs; whose affairs, it was seen, might be done without great cost and travel, and the tutor's expense would be refunded actione tutelæ contraria; and also the discharge by the relict bore, “that the tutor would made no benefit nor profit in his office of tutory,” which was not a clause allowable, the tutor being bound, in law, to do his office, without respect of profit. But this decision was thereafter altered.
Alt. Burnet. Clerk, Hay.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting