[1629] Mor 9736
Subject_1 PASSIVE TITLE.
Subject_2 DIVISION I. Behaviour as Heir.
Subject_3 SECT. IX. Apparent Heir paying his predecessor's Debts.
Date: Douglas
v.
Lawson
14 February 1629
Case No.No 78.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In an action pursued by Henry Douglas against John Lawson, Boghall's brother, whom he pursued as heir to his brother, &c. he verified him to be heir, in so far as Mr Lewis Stuart being infeft in wadset in a tenement in Edinburgh belonging to Boghall, he set a back-tack of the same to Boghall and his heirs, for payment of so much as effeired to his annualrent, of which back-tack duty the said John Lawson had taken discharges from Mr Lewis since his brother's decease.—The Lords found this relevant to make him heir.
*** Auchinleck reports this case: An apparent heir, who received a discharge of the duties contained in a back-bond, set by a wadsetter to his predecessor, to whom he is apparent heir, is found gessisse pro hærede.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting