Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
The pursuer of spuilzie of goods alleges a month's possession in the summons, but libels no other right to the goods. The defender alleges he had right to the goods wherewith he intromitted from the person to whom the goods pertained, and who had them in possession a year before. The Lords ordained the pursuer to condescend upon his right to his property of the goods.
