Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION reported by SIR ROBERT SPOTISWOODE OF PENTLAND.
Subject_2 Such of the following Decision as are of a Date prior to about the year 1620, must have been taken by Spotiswoode from some of the more early Reporters. The Cases which immediately follow have no Date affixed to them by Spotiswoode.
Date: The Earl of Marr
v.
His Vassals
11 January 1628 Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In the improbation pursued by the Earl of Marr against his Vassals,—Alleged by the defenders, That my Lord Erskine had no interest to pursue them, or to seek production of their writs, because he was not infeft in the Earldom of Marr, but only was made assignee by his father to that action, and all benefit did redound thereby. The Lords sustained the pursuit, in respect of his father's infeftment, who was his cedent.
Page 19.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting