[1627] Mor 7799
Subject_1 JUS TERTII.
Subject_2 SECT. III. Not competent to object against a Party's title, without a Legal Interest. - What understood to be a Legal Interest.
Date: King
v.
Ker
13 July 1627
Case No.No 26.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
A mother who contracted a tocher with her daughter, at her marriage, was found entitled to repete the same from the husband, her daughter having died within the year; although it was alleged, that the tocher was paid out of the daughter's means, and, therefore, repetition competent only to her representatives; in regard, it was jus tertii to the husband to plead upon their right, and he ought to repete to the mother, from whom he got it, she being liable to her daughter's representatives, if she intromitted with her money; only she
was ordained to find caution to the husband, to warrant him at their hands, and at the hands of all others claiming interest. *** This case is No 380. p. 6169., voce Husband and Wife.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting