[1624] Mor 6685
Subject_1 IMPROBATION.
Subject_2 SECT. IV. Who must satisfy Production. - What terms allowed for Production. What incumbent on the Defender. - What his Privileges.
Date: Elphinston
v.
Marr
17 February 1624
Case No.No 100.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In my Lord Elphinston's improbation against the Earl of Marr, it was found that in calling for retours and services, the director of Chancery or the clerk to the process of the services should have been summoned.
* * * See Haddington and Durie's report of this case, voce Citation, No 79. p. 2217. and No 80. p. 2218.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting