Subject_1 ADJUDICATION and APPRISING. Subject_2 Of the DEBT which is the FOUNDATION of the DILIGENCE.
Laird of Lugton v. Alexander Cranston
Date: 19 July 1622 Case No. No 3.
A comprising was found null, because the sums decerned for, were greater than those contained in the denunciation.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In an action, pursued by the Laird of Lugton against Alexander Cranston and others, for reduction of their comprising of the living of East Nisbet.—The Lords found, that a comprising was null, wherein the sums of the comprising were greater, than the sums contained in the denunciation; and would not permit the defenders to reduce their sum, by their declaration, to the sums decerned for.
