[1620] Mor 6616
Subject_1 IMPROBATION. Subject_2 SECT. I. To Whom this action competent. La Huntly v. Lo Forbes. Date: 7 December 1620 Case No. No 11. Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy In improbations, found that a precept of sasine granted by a predecessor, not being of clare constat, did not stay certification, because the precept bore in feu-farm, and bore not the duty. Kerse, MS. fol. 207.
To Whom this action competent.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In improbations, found that a precept of sasine granted by a predecessor, not being of clare constat, did not stay certification, because the precept bore in feu-farm, and bore not the duty.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting
