[1616] Mor 12302
Subject_1 PROOF.
Subject_2 DIVISION I. Allegeances how relevant to be proved.
Subject_3 SECT. III. What Proof relavant to take away Writ.
Date: Edmonston
v.
Hamilton
19 March 1616
Case No.No 58.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In a reduction of a decreet of removing, pursued by William Edmonston against John Hamilton of Kinaber, the Lords found a reason relevant upon a promise made, that he should bruik for an year, which promise was made after the warning, and before the sentence, relevant to be proved by witnesses.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting