[1616] Mor 6662
Subject_1 IMPROBATION.
Subject_2 SECT. II. Conclusion calling for all Writs in general.
Date: Duncanson
v.
Pitcairn
16 December 1616
Case No.No 69.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In an action of improbation pursued at the instance of Roger Duncanson contra Henry Pitcairn, the Lords repelled an incident diligence, because it bore the evidents generally, as the libel of improbation did not condescend upon the special evidents.
The like betwixt the Laird of Innerkeith and Achintill.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting