Subject_1 WITNESS.
Earl Marshall
v.
Burnet
1614. June.
Case No.No. 33.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In an action betwixt the Earl of Marshall and Burnet, the Lords found an evident relevant against the Earl, which they ordained to be proved by certain witnesses, upon whose names the defender condescended. At the terms of probation he produces diligence against three of the witnesses allenarly. The Lords found, that he should have three terms, and that he should summon the rest in any of the three terms.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting