[1613] Mor 13821
Subject_1 REMOVING.
Subject_2 SECT. III. Warning, in what Cases necessary. - How to be executed.
Date: Forbes
v.
Forbes
2 July 1613
Case No.No 58.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In an action of ejection pursued by John Forbes of Blackton contra Robert Forbes, Prior of Monymusk, the Lords repelled an exception founded upon voluntary removing, and certain deeds qualified to infer the same, such as delivery of the plenishing of the house, selling a part of the corn being upon the tends, transporting of the rest to a room called ——, selling of the oxen that laboured the land, familiar haunting of the house of Tullich, out of the which the pursuer's father Was ejected, and that his father nominated the defendee everseer to his son in his testament.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting