In what cases Extracts sustained to satisfy production. - When condescendence of the writs called for is sufficient. - Transumpts.
Home v. Pringle
Date: 22 Novembers 1610 Case No. No 109.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In an action pursued by Thomas Home, brother to Coldingknows, against James Pringle of Whytbank, it was found that Whytbank might improve the extract of the horning, albeit the principal was not produced.
