[1610] Mor 4685
Subject_1 FORFEITURE.
Subject_2 SECT. III. With what burdens forfeiture is affected.
Date: Campbell
v.
L of Lochnoras.
14 July 1610
Case No.No 25.
Found that by the forfeiture of a subvassal, not only his own right, but all rights flowing from him are carried.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
A sub-vassal being forfeited, he who is infeft in his lands upon the King's presentation may remove the sub-vassal's vassal, albeit he have possessed forty or fifty years after the forfeiture; and needs not to reduce nor annul his infeftment; because the forfeiture of his superior is a decreet of Parliament, whereby his right, and all rights flowing from him, are in effect reduced. Campbell against Laird Lochnoras having right to lands in Cumnock from Riccarton Hepburn, who was vassal thereof to James Earl Bothwell, who, before his forfeiture, held them of Dunbar of Cumnock.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting