[1600] 5 Brn 590
Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION. reported by ALEXANDER TAIT, CLERK OF SESSION, one of the reporters for the faculty.
Subject_2 SASINE.
M'Lean
v.
The Duke of Argyle
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In the process M'Lean against Duke of Argyle, it was objected to a sasine in the year 1679 in favour of the Earl of Argyle, That the charter contained a dispensation to take infeftment at or upon any part of the ground of the lands; whereas, in fact, the sasine was given not at one, but at different places: in a word, the dispensation was not made use of. The Lords disregarded the objection. It was further objected that the sasine was incorrect, as it mentioned that infeftment had been given in certain of the lands upon the 2d, 3d, 4th, and 5th days of November, without specifying the particular parcels in which infeftment was given each day. The Lords also disregarded this objection.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting