[1566] Mor 605
Subject_1 APPROBATE and REPROBATE.
Date: George Weir
v.
The L of Lie.
14 July 1566
Case No.No 1.
Found that a party might lawfully approve and make use of one part of an instrument for proving his intent, and yet offer to improve another part of the same as false.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Anent the action to be pursued by George Weir against the L. of Lie, for delivering to the said George of his brother's son and pupil, to whom the said George was made tutor testamentar, and therefore the said George should have the keeping of the said pupil: It was alleged, by the said defender, that the said George should not have the keeping of the said pupil, because the Laird of Stonebyres, guidsir to the said pupil, obtained the gift, and the ward of the marriage of the lands of the said pupil, to him and his assigney, and made the Laird of Lie, defender, his assigney to the samen. It was alleged, by the said pursuer, that, long before the assignation, the Laird of Stonebyres made the said pupil assigney to the said ward and marriage. Whilk allgeance of the pursuer was given to his probation; and, to prove the whilk allegeance, the said George produced an nottar, to produce an instrument, to prove his intent. Whilk nottar produced an instrument, bearing in effect, that the said L. of Stonebyres made the said pupil assigney to his own ward and marriage; and thereafter it was contended, that the said Laird, of his gude, have the maintaining and guiding of the said pupil. It was alleged, by the said defender, that the instrument had proven his intent toward the keeping of the said pupil, by reason of the second clause contained in the said instrument. It was alleged, by the pursuer, that the second clause was false and feigned, and offered him to improve the samen, omni modo quo ut de jure. It was alleged, by the defender, that the said pursuer might not improve one part of the instrument, and affirm another part to be liell. Whilk allegeance of the defender was repelled by the Lords; and found, by interlocutor, that the said pursuer might affirm one part of the said instrument to be true for proving his intent, and might improve another part of the same.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting