Reduction on the head of Interdiction, to whom competent.
Ure v. Mitchelson
Date: 14 March 1554 Case No. No 41.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Anent the action pursued by F. Ure against Robert Mitchelson, for reduction of an infeftment of alienation, made by the said F. to the said R., because the said F., long before the said alienation, had interdicted himself from all manner of alienation of his lands, and of his goods, in favours of his brother and his sisters; it was alleged by the said R., That the said F. should not be heard, nor stand in judgment to pursue the said reduction, the interdiction standing, without consent of them in whose favour the said interdiction was made; which allegeance of the said Robert was found relevant.
