Whether Reduction be requisite of Decrees Arbitral; - Of Legal Instruments; - Of Inhibitions; - Of a Deed executed by a Woman vestita viro; - Of a Decree of Preference in a Multiplepoinding.
Hamilton v. Hamilton
Date: 11 February 1540 Case No. No 21.
Found that no exception of iniquity, nullity, &c. can be proponed against a decree-arbitral; a reduction only being competent.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Na exceptioun of iniquitie, nullitie, or uther quhatsumever, may be proponit or allegit contrare the executioun of ane decrete-arbitral Iauchfullie given. But the proponer thairof sould use and allege the samin, be way of actioun, gif he pleisis, for reductioun and retractatioun of the said decrete.
Fol. Dic. v. 1. p. 171. Balfour, (Arbitration.) p. 415.
