[1492] Mor 4657
Subject_1 FORFEITURE.
Subject_2 SECT. II. What carried by Forfeiture.
Date: The King
v.
The Lord of St John
1 February 1492
Case No.No 7.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Gif ony free tenant haldand landis of ony superiour under the King, ather spiritual or temporal, commit ony crime of tressoun, and is foirfaultit thairfoir, the King, because he cannot hald landis of ony man, sould present ane tenent to the said immediat overlord spiritual or temporal, of all and hail the landis, quhilkis sumtime pertenit to him that is foirfaltit, and require the said overlord to give infeftment heritabillie of the samin landis to him quha is presentit; for, in sic caisis, powar and richt of presentatioun is understuid to pertene to his Grace as escheat; except the said overlord be specially infeft with fie and foirfalture of his awin tenents; and the tenent quha is presentit may obtene a charge be deliverance of the Lordis of Counsal, under the testimonial of the Greit Seill conform to his presentatioun, and thairwith charge the said overlord to ressave him as immediat tenent to him in the saidis landis, and infeft him and his airis, be chartour and sasine thairintill, to be haldin of the said overlord als frelie as the said persoun that is foirfaltit held the samin of him befoir; the quhilk gif the said overlord refusis to do, the said tenent may raise the remanent preceptis of our Soverane Lord's Chancellarie to charge the said overlord to ressave him in tenent in manner foresaid.
*** In the same manner were decided Laird of Ormiston against Laurie Hamilton, 29th March 1561; and Laird of Haltoun against young Laird of Carmichael, 17th March 1568.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting