THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNALS
CASE REF: 1901/18
CLAIMANT: Katarzyna Klosowska
RESPONDENT: Department for the Economy
DECISION
(A) The claimant's appeal under Article 233 of the Employment Rights Order 1996 ("ERO"), in respect of her wages' application to the respondent Department is
well-founded.
(B) The claimant's Article 233 appeal in respect of holiday pay is well-founded.
(C) The claimant's Article 233 appeal in respect of notice pay is well-founded.
(D) Hopefully, the amounts due to the claimant, in relation to the relevant applications, will be agreed by the Department and the claimant. If not, either party is at liberty to request the holding of a remedies hearing. During the course of any such remedies hearing, I would determine any relevant amounts which ought to be paid to the claimant.
Constitution of Tribunal:
Employment Judge (sitting alone): Employment Judge Buggy
Appearances:
The claimant was self-represented.
The Department was represented by Ms Harriet Ferguson.
REASONS
1. I announced my decisions at the end of the hearing. At the same time, I gave brief oral reasons for those decisions.
2. I regarded the claimant as an honest witness.
3. Throughout the course of the relevant employment, the claimant was employed by Ms Sandra Kachel, who has since become bankrupt.
Employment Judge:
Date and place of hearing: 14 June 2018, Belfast.
Date decision recorded in register and issued to parties: