THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNALS
CASE REF: 832/17
CLAIMANT: Jamie Minta
RESPONDENT: James McClurkin
DEFAULT JUDGEMENT
1. The relevant time limit for presenting a response has expired. In his response, the respondent has stated that he does not intend to resist the claim. I have decided to determine the following claim without a hearing. I determine as follows:
2. The claimant’s unfair dismissal claim is well-founded. It is ordered that, in respect of unfair dismissal, the respondent shall pay to the claimant the sum of £2,000 (which is the basic award element of the claimant’s unfair dismissal compensation plus the amount of any compensatory award).
3. The basic award is an award of four weeks’ pay (subject to a deemed maximum of £500 per week).
4. The basic award amounts to four weeks’ pay because of the effect of Article 130A(1)(a) of the Employment Rights Order 1996.
5. The amount of any compensatory award will be assessed during the course of a remedies hearing if the claimant asks for such a hearing to be held.
Employment Judge: ____________________________________
Date decision entered in register and issued to the parties:
______________________________________
For the Secretary of the Tribunals