Freely Available British and Irish Public Legal Information
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]
Industrial Tribunals Northern Ireland Decisions
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Industrial Tribunals Northern Ireland Decisions >> Graham v Robert Raymond Cunningham [2016] NIIT 00318_16IT (04 March 2016)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/nie/cases/NIIT/2016/00318_16IT.html
Cite as: [2016] NIIT 318_16IT, [2016] NIIT 00318_16IT
[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]
THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNALS
CASE REF: 318/16
CLAIMANT: David Samuel Graham
RESPONDENT: Robert Raymond Cunningham
Certificate of Correction
The Decision issued on 4 March 2016, included the following sentence: “The respondent was debarred from participating in the hearing because the respondent did not present a response within the relevant time-limit.” That sentence is inaccurate. (The respondent did present a timely response; he was not debarred from participating; and he did participate).
The following is substituted in place of that inaccurate sentence:
“The respondent was self-represented”.
Employment Judge: _____________________________________
Date: _______________________________________________
THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNALS
CASE REF: 318/16
CLAIMANT: David Samuel Graham
RESPONDENT: Robert Raymond Cunningham
DECISION
The claimant’s redundancy pay claim against the respondent is well-founded and it is declared that the respondent is liable to make a redundancy payment of £4,538 to the claimant.
Constitution of the Tribunal:
Employment Judge (sitting alone): Employment Judge Buggy
Appearances:
The claimant was represented by Mr Sean Doherty. Barrister-at-Law
The respondent was debarred from participating in the hearing because the respondent did not present a response within the relevant time-limit.
CASE REF: 318/16
REASONS
- I announced my decision at the end of the hearing. At the same time, I gave brief oral reasons for that decision.
- This Decision is based on the following information:
Gross weekly pay: £ 275
Net weekly pay: £ N/A
Number of actual completed years of service: 14
Age on date of dismissal: 46
Multiplier (for redundancy pay): 16.5
3. I am satisfied that it is just and equitable that this employee should receive a redundancy payment.
- This is a relevant decision for the purposes of the Industrial Tribunals (Interest) Order (Northern Ireland) 1990.
Employment Judge: _________________________
Date and place of hearing: 4 March 2016, Belfast
Date decision recorded in register and issued to parties: