Freely Available British and Irish Public Legal Information
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]
Industrial Tribunals Northern Ireland Decisions
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Industrial Tribunals Northern Ireland Decisions >> Spence v Mark Elder [2015] NIIT 2597_14IT (09 January 2015)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/nie/cases/NIIT/2015/2597_14IT.html
Cite as: [2015] NIIT 2597_14IT
[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]
THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNALS
CASE REF: 2597/14
CLAIMANT: Caroline Spence
RESPONDENTS: 1. Mark Elder
2. Noreen Elder
3. Mace Shop
DECISION
(A) The claimant’s holiday pay claim is well-founded and it is ordered that the first and second respondents shall pay to the claimant the sum of £302.88 in respect of holiday pay.
(B) The claimant’s claim for notice pay is well-founded and it is ordered that the first and second respondents shall pay to the claimant the sum of £184.94 in respect of notice pay.
(C) The claimant’s redundancy pay claim against the first and second respondents is well-founded and it is declared that the first and second respondents are liable to make a redundancy payment of £1987.65 to the claimant.
Constitution of the Tribunal:
Employment Judge (sitting alone): Miss McCaffrey
Appearances:
The claimant was self-represented.
The respondent was debarred from participating in the hearing because the respondent did not present a response within the relevant time-limit.
CASE REF: 2597/14
REASONS
- I announced my decision at the end of the hearing. At the same time, I gave brief oral reasons for that decision.
- This Decision is based on the following information:
Gross weekly pay: £189.30
Net weekly pay: £184.94
Number of actual completed years of service: 7
Age on date of dismissal: 51
Multiplier (for redundancy pay): 10.5
- This is a relevant decision for the purposes of the Industrial Tribunals (Interest) Order (Northern Ireland) 1990.
Employment Judge: _________________________
Date and place of hearing: 9 January 2015, Belfast
Date decision recorded in register and issued to parties:
THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNALS
CASE REF: 2638/14
CLAIMANT: John White
RESPONDENTS: 1. Grahams Kitchen Centre Limited
2. George Graham
DECISION
(D) The claimant’s wages claim is well-founded and it is ordered that the respondent shall pay to the claimant the sum of £ in respect of wages.
(E) The claimant’s holiday pay claim is well-founded and it is ordered that the respondent shall pay to the claimant the sum of £ in respect of holiday pay.
(F) The claimant’s claim for notice pay is well-founded and it is ordered that the respondent shall pay to the claimant the sum of £ in respect of notice pay.
(G) The claimant’s redundancy pay claim against the respondent is well-founded and it is declared that the respondent is liable to make a redundancy payment of £ to the claimant.
Constitution of the Tribunal:
Employment Judge (sitting alone): Miss McCaffrey
Appearances:
The claimant was self-represented.
The respondent was debarred from participating in the hearing because the respondent did not present a response within the relevant time-limit.
CASE REF: 2638/14
REASONS
- I announced my decision at the end of the hearing. At the same time, I gave brief oral reasons for that decision.
- This Decision is based on the following information:
Gross weekly pay: £
Net weekly pay: £
Number of actual completed years of service:
Age on date of dismissal:
Multiplier (for redundancy pay):
- This is a relevant decision for the purposes of the Industrial Tribunals (Interest) Order (Northern Ireland) 1990.
Employment Judge: _________________________
Date and place of hearing: 9 January 2015, Belfast
Date decision recorded in register and issued to parties:
THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNALS
CASE REF: 2372/14
CLAIMANT: John Leonard O’Regan
RESPONDENT: Department for Employment and Learning
DECISION
(H) The claimant’s wages claim is well-founded and it is ordered that the respondent shall pay to the claimant the sum of £ in respect of wages.
(I) The claimant’s holiday pay claim is well-founded and it is ordered that the respondent shall pay to the claimant the sum of £ in respect of holiday pay.
(J) The claimant’s claim for notice pay is well-founded and it is ordered that the respondent shall pay to the claimant the sum of £ in respect of notice pay.
(K) The claimant’s redundancy pay claim against the respondent is well-founded and it is declared that the respondent is liable to make a redundancy payment of £ to the claimant.
Constitution of the Tribunal:
Employment Judge (sitting alone): Miss McCaffrey
Appearances:
The claimant was self-represented.
The respondent was represented by ____________ from the Department for Employment and Learning
CASE REF: 2372/14
REASONS
- I announced my decision at the end of the hearing. At the same time, I gave brief oral reasons for that decision.
- This Decision is based on the following information:
Gross weekly pay: £
Net weekly pay: £
Number of actual completed years of service:
Age on date of dismissal:
Multiplier (for redundancy pay):
- This is a relevant decision for the purposes of the Industrial Tribunals (Interest) Order (Northern Ireland) 1990.
Employment Judge: _________________________
Date and place of hearing: 9 January 2015, Belfast
Date decision recorded in register and issued to parties: