THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNALS
CASE REF: 1030/15
CLAIMANT: Mairead Hancock
RESPONDENT: 1. MP Estates UK
2. Janice Richardson
DECISION
(A) On the basis of the evidence heard I am satisfied that the claimant was employed by the second named respondent, and the first named respondent is dismissed from these proceedings
(B) The claimant's wages claim is well-founded and it is ordered that the second respondent shall pay to the claimant the sum of £ 1384.60 in respect of wages.
(C) The claimant's claim for notice pay is well-founded and it is ordered that the respondent shall pay to the claimant the sum of £ 300 in respect of notice pay.
Constitution of the Tribunal:
Employment Judge (sitting alone): Employment Judge McCaffrey
Appearances:
The claimant was self-represented.
The respondent was debarred from participating in the hearing because the respondent did not present a response within the relevant time-limit.
CASE REF: 1030/15
REASONS
Gross weekly pay: £ 346.15
Net weekly pay: £ 300.00
Number of actual completed years of service: N/A
Age on date of dismissal: N/A
Multiplier (for redundancy pay): N/A
Employment Judge : _________________________
Date and place of hearing: 30 July 2015, Belfast
Date decision recorded in register and issued to parties: