Freely Available British and Irish Public Legal Information
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]
Industrial Tribunals Northern Ireland Decisions
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Industrial Tribunals Northern Ireland Decisions >> Guggenheim v Peter McCloskey Pater Oliver Hairdressing [2012] NIIT 02985_11IT (24 April 2012)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/nie/cases/NIIT/2012/02985_11IT.html
Cite as: [2012] NIIT 2985_11IT, [2012] NIIT 02985_11IT
[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]
THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNALS
CASE REF: 2985/11
CLAIMANT: Daniel Guggenheim
RESPONDENTS: 1. Peter McCloskey
2. Peter Oliver Hairdressing
DECISION
The unanimous decision of the tribunal is that the claimant’s claims of unfair dismissal and disability discrimination be dismissed.
Constitution of Tribunal:
Chairman: Mr D Buchanan
Members: Mr B Schofield
Mr D Atcheson
Appearances:
The claimant did not appear and was not represented.
The first-named respondent appeared in person and was not represented.
The second-named respondent did not appear and was not represented.
1. The claimant did not appear at the hearing. We were satisfied he had received notice of the proceedings; and no explanation was provided for his absence.
2. No response was entered. The first-named respondent appeared in person. A letter had been received from his accountants, but no application had been made to treat it as a response, nor had any explanation been given as to why the time-limits for submitting a response could not have been complied with.
3. The tribunal dismissed the claimant’s claims. Before doing so it considered information in its possession which had been made available to it by the parties, including the claimant’s claim form.
Chairman:
Date and place of hearing: 24 April 2012, Belfast
Date decision recorded in register and issued to parties: