THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNALS
CASE REF: 1998/10
CLAIMANT: Tomas Kavaliauskis
RESPONDENTS: 1. Fisher Metal Engineering Ltd (in administrative
receivership)
2. Fisher Metal Engineering LLP
DECISION
The claimant’s claims against both respondents are dismissed.
Constitution of Tribunal:
Chairman (sitting alone): Mr Paul Buggy
Appearances:
There was no appearance by or on behalf of any of the parties.
REASONS
1.
The claimant is one of a group of
former employees of Fisher Metal Engineering LLP who have brought claims
against that respondent in respect of employment-related debts.
2.
Rule 27(5) of the Industrial
Tribunals Rules provides that, if a party fails to attend or to be represented
(for the purpose of conducting the party’s case at a main hearing), at the time
and place fixed for the main hearing, the tribunal has a discretion either to
dismiss or to dispose of the proceedings in the absence of that party, or the tribunal
may, as an alternative, adjourn the hearing to a later date.
3.
I know of no good reason for the
non-attendance of the claimant at this hearing. I note that he was not present
at a previous Case Management Discussion (which was held in February 2011) and
that, on that earlier occasion, he also gave no reason for his non-attendance.
4.
Against that background, I
decided that I would dispose of the proceedings in the claimant’s absence.
Because he was not present at this hearing, there was no adequate evidence
available to support the claimant’s claims. Accordingly, I dismissed all of
those claims.
Chairman:
Date and place of hearing: 23 March 2011, Belfast.
Date decision recorded in register and issued to parties: