CASE REFS: 682/05
768/05
CLAIMANTS: Kathleen Johnston
Mardi Bell
RESPONDENT: Siobhan Mellon
The unanimous decision of the tribunal is that the first-named claimant is entitled to a redundancy payment, notice pay and holiday pay totalling £2,519.41 and that the second-named claimant is entitled to a redundancy payment and notice pay totalling £1,826.85.
Constitution of Tribunal:
Chairman: Mr Wimpress
Members: Mr White
Ms Townsley
Appearances:
The claimants were unrepresented.
The respondent did not appear and was not represented.
Notice
Article 118(1) of the Employment Rights (Northern Ireland) Order provides that the notice required to be given by an employer to terminate the contract of employment of a person who has been continuously employed for one month or more:-
(b) is not less than one week's notice for each year of continuous employment if his period of continuous employment is two years or more but less than twelve years.
The first-named claimant was therefore entitled to receive the statutory minimum notice of six weeks. On the basis of the first-named claimant's undisputed evidence, it is clear that she did not in fact receive any notice at all.
The tribunal therefore orders the respondent to pay to the first claimant six weeks' net pay in lieu of notice - £1,080.42 (£180.07 x 6).
The tribunal therefore orders the respondent to pay to the second-named claimant five weeks' net pay in lieu of notice, - £837.95 (£167.59 x 5).
The relevant provisions of the Employment Rights (Northern Ireland) Order are as follows:-
"Article 170(1) - An employer shall pay a redundancy payment to any employee of his if the employee –
(a) is dismissed by the employer by reason of redundancy.
Article 171(1) - Subject to the provisions of this Article and Articles 172 and 173, for the purposes of this Part an employee is dismissed by his employer if (and only if) –
(a) the contract under which he is employed by the employer is terminated by the employer (whether with or without notice).
Article 174(1) - For the purposes of this Order an employee who is dismissed shall be taken to be dismissed by reason of redundancy if the dismissal is wholly or mainly attributable to –
(a) the fact that his employer has ceased or intends to cease –
(i) to carry on the business for the purposes of which the employee was employed by him, or …..
Article 180 (1) - For the purposes of the provisions of this Order relating to redundancy payments 'the relevant date' in relation to the dismissal of an employee has the meaning given by this Article –
(2) Subject to the following provisions of this Article, 'the relevant date' –
(b) in relation to an employee whose contract of employment is terminated without notice, means the date on which the termination takes effect."
The relevant date is 5 March 2005 for both claimants.
The first-named claimant's age at the date of the termination of her employment was 34. She had completed six years of employment. Her gross pay was £200.00 per week.
6 x £200 = £1,200.00
The first-named claimant is therefore entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,200.00.
5 x £197.78 = £988.90
The second-named claimant is therefore entitled to a redundancy payment of £988.90
We accept the evidence of the first-named claimant that she is entitled to outstanding holiday pay. The leave year ran from October to October and her outstanding holiday pay entitlement is 6.6 days pro rata. She is therefore entitled to 6.6 days wages.-
6.6 x £36.21 (net pay) = £238.99
The first-named claimant is entitled to:-
Notice Pay £1,080.42
Redundancy Pay £1,200.00
Holiday Pay £ 238.99
Total £2,519.41
The second-named claimant is entitled to:-
Notice Pay £ 837.95
Redundancy Pay £ 988.90
Total £1,826.85
Chairman:
Date and place of hearing: 6 June 2006, Belfast
Date decision recorded in register and issued to parties: