Inferior Number Sentencing - motoring
Before : |
R. J. MacRae, Esq., Deputy Bailiff, and Jurats Dulake and Entwistle |
The Attorney General
-v-
Jose Leonardo Santos Coelho
Sentencing by the Inferior Number of the Royal Court, following guilty pleas to the following charges:
1 count of: |
Using a motor vehicle without insurance, contrary to Article 2(1) of the Motor Traffic (Third Party Insurance) (Jersey) Law 1948 (Count 1). |
1 count of: |
Keeping an unregistered motor vehicle, contrary to Article 12(1) of the Motor Vehicle Registration (Jersey) Law 1993 (Count 2) |
1 count of: |
Wrongful use of an insurance disc, contrary to Article 18(1)(a) of the Motor Traffic (Third Party Insurance) (Jersey) Law 1948 (Count 3) |
1 count of: |
Fraudulent use of a registration mark, contrary to Article 13(a) of the Motor Vehicle Registration (Jersey) Law 1993 (Count 4) |
1 count of: |
Failing to maintain an exhaust system and silencer as required by Paragraph 59(2) of the Motor Vehicles (Construction and Use) (Jersey) Order 1998, contrary to Article 77(3) of the Road Traffic (Jersey) Law 1956 (Count 5) |
1 count of: |
Failing to fit such mirrors as specified under Paragraph 33(1) of the Motor Vehicles (Construction and Use) (Jersey) Order 1998, contrary to Article 77(3) of the Road Traffic (Jersey) Law 1956 (Count 6) |
1 count of: |
Failing to maintain seatbelts as required by Paragraph 50(4)(d) of the Motor Vehicles (Construction and Use) (Jersey) Order 1998, contrary to Article 77(3) of the Road Traffic (Jersey) Law 1956 (Count 7) |
1 count of |
Failing to maintain a headlight as required by Paragraph 24(1) of the Road Traffic (Lighting) (Jersey) Order 1998, contrary to Article 77(3) of the Road Traffic (Jersey) Law 1956 (Count 8) |
Age: 20
Plea: Guilty
Details of Offence:
In September 2023, the defendant's neighbour noticed that the insurance disc for her moped was missing from it. On 10 January 2024, her mother contacted the Police to report that she had found her daughter's missing insurance disc on the front of a vehicle parked near their home address.
Police attended the address on 10 January 2024 and located the defendant's vehicle parked in a small car park within the estate displaying the insurance disc belonging to the moped. There were two different registrations plates on the front and rear of the vehicle. The vehicle had not been registered and the defendant did not have any insurance for it. The vehicle was removed and taken to the DVS for inspection and was found to have several defects.
The offending notionally put the defendant in breach of orders imposed by the Royal Court on 10 January 2024, but it was accepted that this was a technical breach, if a breach at all.
Details of Mitigation (including domestic circumstances:
Guilty pleas, benefit of youth, meaningful progress made on the orders imposed in January 2024, cooperative in interview and a short delay.
Previous Convictions:
22 previous convictions for motoring offences and two for possession of cannabis.
Conclusions:
Count 1: |
£300 fine |
Count 2: |
£100 fine |
Count 3: |
100 hours Community Service Order (equivalent to 4 months' Youth Detention) |
Count 4: |
90 hours Community Service Order (equivalent to 3 months' Youth Detention), concurrent |
Count :5 |
No separate penalty |
Count 6: |
No separate penalty |
Count 7: |
No separate penalty |
Count 8: |
No separate penalty |
Breach of pre-existing Community Service Order: order to continue with no separate penalty.
Breach of Probation Order: order to continue with no separate penalty .
Total:100 hours' Community Service (equivalent to 4 months' Youth Detention) to run consecutive to the pre-existing Community Service Order and £400 fine (with appropriate default).
The Crown does not consider that the Defendant's continued presence is detrimental to the Island and so does not make a recommendation for his deportation.
The Crown does not seek an order for costs.
Sentence and Observations of Court:
Count 1: |
£200 fine |
Count 2: |
No separate penalty |
Count 3: |
70 hours Community Service Order (equivalent to 2 months' Youth Detention) |
Count 4: |
70 hours Community Service Order (equivalent to 2 months' Youth Detention), both concurrent to current CSO |
Count 5: |
No separate penalty. |
Count 6 |
No separate penalty |
Count 7: |
No separate penalty |
Count 8: |
No separate penalty |
Breach of pre-existing Community Service Order: order to continue with no separate penalty
Breach of Probation Order: order to continue with no separate penalty
Total: 70 hours' Community Service (equivalent to 2 months' Youth Detention) to run concurrently to the pre-existing Community Service Order and £200 fine (5 days' Youth Detention in default).
Deportation not recommended.
No order for prosecution costs.
L Sette Esq., Crown Advocate.
Advocate M. L. Preston for the Defendant.
JUDGMENT
THE DEPUTY BAILIFF:
1. Jose Coelho, you are 20 years old and 21 next month. You fall to be sentenced for eight motoring offences committed on 10 January this year. Those offences were committed on the same day that you were sentenced for other motoring offences in this Court to 180 hours' community service and 12-months' probation, together with a three-year disqualification from driving.
2. We have re-visited the remarks made by this Court when you were sentenced on the 10 January, 2024 (AG v Coelho [2024] JRC 006). You were told on that day that you had escaped youth custody by a "hair's breadth" and the Court went on to say that you should understand if you failed to complete any part of the community service or probation order that the Court imposed that day, then you would be brought back to Court and almost certainly sent to La Moye. You were told that the orders made by the Court that day were your very last chance. Well, you are not going be sent to La Moye today, because of the progress you have made over the last 10 or 11 months.
3. We can deal with the circumstances of the offences the Court is considering today quite shortly. They were all committed on the same day in respect of the same car. You have pleaded guilty to using this motor vehicle without insurance, keeping it unregistered, the wrongful use of an insurance disc (which is an offence of dishonesty with the intent to deceive which is generally regarded as a serious offence by the Courts), fraudulent use of a registration mark and various offences in relation to the state of the vehicle - failing to maintain the exhaust system and silencer, failing to fit mirrors as specified, failing to maintain seatbelts as required and failing to maintain a headlight as required by the relevant legislation.
4. The car in question was in a public car park in St Martin on the 10 January. There was no evidence that you drove the car in this condition. The insurance disc referred to at Count 3 was stolen in September of last year and was found displayed on your vehicle. The vehicle was not registered, and you had no insurance for it. The vehicle was impounded by the Police and later released to you. We hear today that it was later sold by you for spare parts.
5. In interview, you said you had been given the vehicle for free in December. It had been towed to your address as the clutch did not work. You said that you intended to use the car for sand racing and planned to have it towed to the beach. You said that the vehicle had arrived at your home address without registration plates, and you put two different registration plates onto the car, one on the front and one on the back, and these were from old cars. You did not register the car as it had no logbook. You agreed that it was uninsured as you were disqualified from driving, and you could not obtain insurance. Examination of the vehicle revealed the defects to which we have already referred.
6. Accordingly, you admitted the offences in interview, and you pleaded guilty to these offences at the first opportunity when you appeared in the Magistrate's Court on 17 July. You will receive full credit for those pleas of guilty.
7. Now the Probation Report says that you remain at medium risk of re-conviction, but there has been a real change in your attitude as a consequence of the orders made, and during the period that has elapsed since January. We would like to read one or two extracts from the Pre-Sentence Report so that it is understood, when our remarks are published, the efforts that you have made and the extent to which people can change when provided with a chance by the Court, and given the help that you have been given by the Probation Service.
8. The Probation Officer says that there has been a noticeable and marked change in your attitude. She says, that you have always presented as polite, respectful and willing to engage, you have never failed to attend an appointment, you have never been late, and you have taken on board the suggestions that have been made to you for improving your lifestyle. You are now working full time, in a stable relationship with a woman who has written to the Court on your behalf and of course you have not re-offended during this time.
9. In relation to community service, you have not missed a single session. The Manager of the Community Service Team describes you as "being as good as gold", polite, respectful and hardworking. You have done 105 hours with 75 left. You are to be commended for the work you have done and the changes that you have made in your life. We are impressed with the letter that you have written to the Court and the letters of support from your family and those who are close to you.
10. In terms of sentencing today, the Crown invites the Court to impose a consecutive order of 100 hours' community service. We are not going to do that for two reasons. Firstly, had these matters all been dealt with on the 10 January then you would have been in principle subjected to a concurrent sentence and secondly, we do not want to discourage you from continuing to make the good progress which you have.
11. So, in relation to the counts on the Indictment, in relation to Count 1 we reduce the fine sought to £200. In relation to Count 2 we order no separate penalty. In relation to Counts 3 and 4 we order you to perform 70 hours' community service, equivalent to 2 months' youth detention. But those two orders are to run concurrent to your current order. So, on the footing that you comply with the current order and these orders you will do no additional hours to those which you are currently subject to. But in view of the seriousness of those offences we needed to mark the offending with a sentence which is a direct alternative to custody.
12. We order no separate penalty on Counts 5, 6, 7 and 8 and accordingly the total sentence is a £200 fine and 70 hours' community service concurrent to your existing order. We hope you continue to make the progress that you have, and we earnestly hope that you do not appear before this Court or any other court again. The fine will need to be paid within 4 weeks with 5 days imprisonment in default of payment.
Authorities
Motor Traffic (Third-Party Insurance) (Jersey) Law 1948
Motor Vehicle Registration (Jersey) Law 1993
Road Traffic (Jersey) Law 1956
Criminal Justice (Young Offenders) (Jersey) Law 2014