ROYAL COURT
(Samedi Division)
20 March 1998
Before: FC Hamon, Esq., Deputy Bailiff, and
Jurats Le Ruez and Bullen
AG
- v -
Michael Pascal Zenonos
5 counts of failing to deliver to the Comptroller of Income Tax within the specified time limit, the written statement, mentioned in Article 16 of the Income Tax (Jersey) Law, 1961, as amended:
Count 1: for the year of assessment 1992
Count 2: for the year of assessment 1993
Count 3: for the year of assessment 1994
Count 4: for the year of assessment 1995 and
Count 5: for the year of assessment 1996
Age: 30
Plea: Infractions admitted
Details of Offence:
The defendant failed to make income tax returns for 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995 and 1996. He ignored thirty-four written reminders and only delivered his income tax returns and trading accounts after the prosecution summons was served on him.
Details of Mitigation:
The defendant paid tax on estimated assessments. Thought that as long as he paid taxes completing returns was a formality. No intention to evade payment and in fact overpaid by £6,812.85.
Previous Convictions:
One for careless driving and a number for motoring. Treated as a first offender.
Conclusions:
Count 1: £250 fine or 2 weeks imprisonment in default of payment
Count 2: £250 fine or 2 weeks imprisonment in default of payment
Count 3: £250 fine or 2 weeks imprisonment in default of payment
Count 4: £250 fine or 2 weeks imprisonment in default of payment
Count 5: £250 fine or 2 weeks imprisonment in default of payment
Sentence and Observations of the Court:
Count 1: £125 fine or 2 weeks imprisonment in default of payment
Count 2: £125 fine or 2 weeks imprisonment in default of payment
Count 3: £125 fine or 2 weeks imprisonment in default of payment
Count 4: £125 fine or 2 weeks imprisonment in default of payment
Count 5: £125 fine or 2 weeks imprisonment in default of payment
Default sentences to run consecutively.
The Solicitor General
Advocate RA Falle for the accused
JUDGMENT
THE DEPUTY BAILIFF: We have noted that since 1992 you have received thirty-four reminders from the Comptroller of Income Tax and we have to ask what your reaction might have been if diners in your restaurant had declined to pay their bills for years and years and years.
Your counsel has acknowledged - very fairly - that you admit to having caused considerable extra work and great inconvenience to the Department.
It is perhaps to your credit that you have repaid the arrears and tried to put your affairs entirely in order and we understand from Mr Falle that you have now overpaid the tax by some £6,812.85. This is due to be repaid to you. However, it is very sad that it took a summons to this Court to make you aware of your responsibilities. We do not think that this case can be compared to the case of AG -v- Drummond (13 March 1998) Jersey Unreported and, because of what your counsel has said, we are prepared to fine you a lesser sum - that is £125 on each count consecutive, making a total of £625, or two weeks imprisonment consecutive on each count for non-payment.
Authorities
AG -v- Campbell (21 February 1997) Jersey Unreported
AG -v- Granger (30 May 1997) Jersey Unreported
AG -v- Drummond (13 March 1998) Jersey Unreported